Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts

Friday, 25 January 2013

DJANGO UNCHAINED, Carlisle's Final Word.

"Gentlemen, you had my curiosity. But now you have my attention."
Calvin Candie. 




Script Logic; 1/2

Pace; 0/2


Acting; 2/2


Aesthetic; 2/2


Originality & Intention; 1/2


Final Score; 6/10









Final Word; 
So, a fair bit has been said about this film already. On the one hand, we have critically acclaimed director Spike Lee condemning the film for its depiction of slavery and its overuse of racially provocative language, while the film's stars, including Samuel L Jackson and Jamie Foxx, defend it as an 'important work of art' (yep, that ol' chestnut). We also have Quentin Tarantino (in typically animated and stuttering fashion) loosing his temper during an interview with the BBC. As you'd imagine, I have an opinion on all this, but I'll wade in on that subject later, probably during my long-overdue article on the works of Quentin Tarantino. For now we should consider the film without the murky ambiguity of its subject and behind-the-scenes agendas. I didn't have high hopes, it has to be said (the bitter disappointment of Inglorious still fresh in my mind), but it wasn't the complete mess that I'd expected it to be. I only decided to watch it for the sake of this blog, and because it's all anybody will be talking about for the next couple of weeks (see how I suffer for you people?). 

On the positive side, the first hour is perfection: the slavery is eluded to tastefully, while the violance is comically over-the-top and punctuated with Tarantino's usual flair for irreverent wit (much kudos for the scene where the hooded racisits discuss costume-related issues). What with all the Spaghetti Western styling present in his previous movies, it would seem that this, more than any other project, was the film Tarantino was tailor-made to direct... Everybody gives cracking performances, with particular praise for DiCaprio and Jackson going spectacularly against type, and the script gives everybody some great lines (even if in reality the term 'mother fucker' wasn't used til much later). The locations, the sets and the costume design are also all top notch. Unfortunately, that's where the good stuff ends.
The second hour, where the cruelties inflicted on the slaves is more apparent (subject of the controversy), is over-long and off-kilter with the comic-book sensibility of the set-up, and this apparent return to realism draws attention to the flaws in the script's logic- without wishing to give anything away, the much-aligned Mandingo plot is unnecessary and makes little to no sense at all. Neither is it historically accurate. The last hour again jarringly differs in tone to what has come before, and any tangible sense of realism is cast aside for a disappointing final act; where the ludicrous gun battles are orchestrated to modern-day rap songs, the director has a cameo affecting the World's worst Australian accent, and the hero's horse can dance.

In a nut shell; first hour great, second hour dull and ethically uneasy, and the third hour is dementedly surreal and at the same time dramatically under-whelming. Somewhere in this mess is a decent 90 minuite homage to the Spegetti Westerns of yester-year, but this is unfortunately caught up in the eccentric self indulgence of an egotistical and rambling director- one who occasionally needs to be told 'no'.
 


Wednesday, 28 November 2012

THE AMAZING SPIDERMAN; Carlisle's Final Word.

"I am issuing an arrest warrent for the masked vigilante known as Spiderman!"
George Stacey (The Amazing Spiderman, 2012).
 
 
 
 
 
Script Logic; 1/2
 
Pace; 1/2

Acting; 1/2

Aesthetic; 1/2

Originality & Intention; 0/2

Final Score; 4/10

 

 
Final Word;
A deeply flawed attempt to reboot the franchise, so flawed that it deserves it’s very own article to explain that in better detail (yes, I'm writing one) A slick aesthetic design can’t make up for a shockingly lack-lustre script, dull pace and weak central villain. While admittedly some of the new touches are very interesting, not enough is done to prevent the “seen it all before” issue central to its conception.

 

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

INCEPTION; Carlisle's Final Word.

"You remind me of someone... a man I met in a half-remembered dream. He was possessed of some radical notions."
Saito.
 
 

Script Logic; 1/2
Pace; 2/2
Acting; 2/2
Aesthetic; 2/2
Originality & Intention; 2/2
Score; 9/10


Final Word; sacrificing any sort of explanation for its plot-central technology may sound like a bad decision on paper, but is surprisingly one of the film’s many master strokes-so instead of having to explain away such a far fetched procedure (and thus ruining the audiences suspension of disbelief, as well as cranking up the run-time) Nolan uses that time to instead build on the characters and get to the spectacle. A blockbuster with brains, balls and explosions: what more could you dream of?

Monday, 15 October 2012

BLADE RUNNER, DIRECTOR'S CUT; Carlisle's Final Word.

"I need ya, Decks. This is a bad one, the worst yet. I need the old blade runner, I need your magic."
Bryant.
 
 
 
Script Logic; 1/2
 
Pace; 1/2
Acting; 2/2
Aesthetic; 2/2
Originality & Intention; 2/2
Score; 8/10
 


Final Word; ...
 
Another example of when this review template throws you a curve- ball. Yes the acting, the effects, and the world-building are all top-notch, but I really didn’t enjoy this film, and I realise (once again) that puts me in a minority. I found the film to be alienating and dull, which is strange in itself if you consider I’m a sucker for a good sci-fi, or a thoughtful film. Perhap's I'd feel more warmth if the film had retained it's laconic voice over- which leads onto the subject of all the different cuts there are of this film flying about these days... Honestly, how different can a film be for just a few different moments cut or included here-and-there? Surely it's the same overall experiance? It's like saying your whole holiday would have been a different if only you'd packed the red beach towle and not the blue, or saying "if only the water slide had another bend in it- that would have been soooooo much better!" You get either the same tan, or the same final splash, respectively.
Still, no denying Bladerunner's influence on almost every science fiction movie that followed it (another feather in the cap of Ridley Scott), so I guess it earns its points despite my reservations. Just goes to show you, a ‘good’ film isn’t always an ‘enjoyable’ one, and that even I have difficulty defending my preferences before the hard cold stare of logic.

Monday, 1 October 2012

LAND OF THE DEAD; Carlisle’s Final Word.

“In a world where the dead are returning to life, the word "trouble" loses much of its meaning.”
Kaufman

 
Script Logic; 1/2

Pace; 1/2
Acting; 1/2
Aesthetic; 1/2
Originality & Intention; 2/2

Score; 6/10

Final Word; I didn’t expect much of this film before I watched it, and perhaps those low expectations led to me enjoying this strange little movie more than I otherwise would have...
Interestingly, the film stays clear of the usual early-days setting of popular zombie fodder and delves into the future- exploring the world that springs up as a result of the walking dead, all be it in a fairly surreal and comic-book sensitivity. Anyone familiar with Romero's work will understand his habbit for using film as a way to explore the trends of society, and with a set-up that includes the rich and wealthy safely living high above, while the poor are forced to survive on ground-level, the subtext here is neither as subtle or suprising as past efforts (that said, it's still enough to boil the blood of working class stiffs such as myself). Another thing worth pointing out is Romero’s obvious sympathies with the zombie population, never more apparent than in this film, where we are treated to something of a ‘zombie renascence’. The cast, including Dennis Hopper’s scenery chewing turn as a ruthless millionaire named Kaufman, deliver hit-and-miss performances, and the way in which the story unfolds is similarly scatter-shot, but the gore (when it arrives) is splatter at its best. Highlights include an arena where criminals are piutted against the undead, and the inevitable zombie attack climax. 

The overall effect is a film that all at once manages to be curiously sweet-natured and a warming tribute to straight-to-video 80’s apocalypse-trash the likes of Mad Max and Cyborg. Nice to finally see a modern horror that’s not driven by excess spite.


 

Also, the keen-eyed amongst you may notice the odd genre-cameo including the 2 chained zombies in the scene above. Any guesses as to who they are?

Monday, 24 September 2012

THE DARK KNIGHT RISES; Carlisle’s Final Word.

"Theatricality and deception, powerful agents for the uninitiated. But we are initiated, aren't we Bruce?"
Bane.
 
 
Script Logic; 1/2
Pace; 1/2
Acting; 2/2
Aesthetic; 2/2
Originality & Intention; 2/2

Score; 8/10
 

Final Word; Well, it’s certainly going to be the last of the Nolan Batman films, at no mistake. Powerful, thrilling, broody and epic. Like its predecessor the second act feels a little longer than necessary, but hey, no big deal. Could easily have suffered without the Joker’s up-beat mania, but Tom Hardey’s bane more than steps up as Batman’s strongest foe, offering intimidation in spades and even the odd moment of gallows’ humour. Again, the film’s more earnest moments are handled expertly by secondary characters Jim Gordon and Alfred the butler, again giving the film its heart. Look out for a scene stealing turn from a previous Batman villain as a self-appointed ’judge & jury’.
A film so good, it deserves a second quote?
 
"A hero can be anyone. Even a man doing something as simple and reassuring as putting a coat around a little boy's shoulders to let him know that the world hadn't ended."
Batman