Sunday, 30 June 2013

THE GUARD; Carlisle's Final Word

"I'm Irish sir. Racism is part of my culture."
Sergeant Gerry Boyle
 


Script Logic; 2/2

Pace; 1/2

Acting; 2/2

Aesthetic; 1/2

Originality & Intention; 1/2

Final Score; 7/10





Final Word; I actually watched this months ago and just forgot to write a review, which is criminal seeing as this is such a great little film.
The cast almost reads like a who's-who of unappreciated British acting greats, including Mark Strong and Liam Cunningham, but it's Brenden Gleeson's larger-than-life portrayal of embittered, rule-bending and curmudgeonly Irish cop Gerry Boyle that makes the film such a success. The dialogue is blade-sharp and caustic, and the one-liners come thick and fast- rarely do any of them miss the mark. While 'cop-buddy-comedy-drama' may not exactly sound all that original for a concept, I promise you that you've not seen it played out quite like this before. Think Heartbeat meets The French Connection by way of In Bruges and you'll have an idea of what to expect...
I'll be the first to admit it's an odd film, but it's well worth finding. Not for the easily offended.

Monday, 24 June 2013

"NO TEARS, PLEASE. IT'S A WASTE OF GOOD SUFFERING!"



Pinhead (Hellraiser, 1987)

Smoking kills.


I'm banging on about horror again.


Not really a continuation of my last horror-themed post, but related. Sort of.


I finished last time by saying that horror continually changes through the years to address the fears that speak most to us in our present time, and so the more we learn and the more we evolve the less we find frightening. With every passing year the overall trend seems to be that old cliché “man is the most frightening beast of all”, that man is scarier than anything else because it’s real! Even the most hardened horror fan would be pushed to come up with a way to inflict evil on his fellow man that hasn’t already been used in the real world… Boogymen are a thing of the past, Jason, Freddy and Pinhead stand aside for masked intruders and serial killers. These days, the supernatural is predominantly the domain of fantasy, and alien beings to science fiction, although the odd exception is noted.


Anyway, that's all wildly off-topic.

I used to be under the belief that “they just don’t make horrors like they used to!” I often said things to the effect of “horrors were much scarier in my day” and “modern horrors are all about nastiness and gore”- although I’ll concede nasty and gory horrors have been doing good business since the 70’s, they usually had more going on than simple savagery (Last House On The Left oozed uncomfortable subtext, while Texas Chainsaw Massacre was always a case of ‘seeing less than you remembered’), and now days these torture-porns prove the rule rather than the exception.

In my day, teenagers (usually under-age) cut their teeth on classics like Friday the 13th, Halloween, A Nightmare On Elmstreet- you know, real horrors! Except I’d never got round to seeing Clive Barker’s Hellraiser… I decided 'tonight was the night' to put right an injustice in my childhood, and so watched the 80's "horror classic" Hellraiser. All this, under the belief that I’d somehow missed out on one of the horror classics of my generation. 

Now, let me tell you something- it’s caused me to have something of a reassessment. 

Hellraiser, the film itself, was mediocre at best; although it does boast some wonderfully grisly effects and a creepy nightmare-come-real vibe missing from most clean-cut modern horrors (I personally think the film grain lends something to that, as it does in the first Texas Chainsaw Massacre). Despite its mediocrity, Hellraiser has earned itself high praise in horror-circles as a definitive 80’s horror. To begin with I assumed this was just a case of overly high expectations, and after this I decided that it was just a poor film, but with a little more thought I came to a stark realisation:

"Maybe horror films aren’t getting any less scary; maybe I’m just getting harder to scare? And not just me, but my whole generation?"

Are we just becoming overly used to the language of cinema, and of all the old and familiar horror tricks that used to scare us as young teens? Perhaps today’s horrors are doing the job just as adequately as ever, except that we’re now too experienced and cynical to become lost in the macabre suspension of disbelief necessary for 'fear'? If I’d watched Hellraiser as a 17 year old, I’m fairly certain it would have creeped me out, it’s certainly more extreme than many of the other films that had me reaching for the light in the dead of night. I mean, those 70's and 80's horrors were almost a rites-of-passage for the teenagers watching them- you watched them with friends or on dates to prove you were brave, and that you could stomach the gore. They were exhilarating. Is that so very different to the droves of kids paying to see the latest Saw or Final Destination, no matter how derogatory us "oldies" find them?

Case and point: 

I remember the first time I watched Friday The 13th. I was probably 12 or 13, a friend lent it to me and I watched it on my own- my parents had gone shopping. Spoiler ahead. The following could be partially inaccurate but this is how I remember it. Close to the end of the film (and I was already unnerved by this point) the camera pans out as our last remaining character relaxes on a boat drifting lazily on the lake. The sun has come up, and the terrors of the night seem distant, easy-listening music can be heard… THEN A GREAT BIG FUCKING ZOMBIE comes BURSTING out the still water, HUGE FUCKING KNIFE in hand, and pulls our heroine down into the murky deep. I kid you not, I fucking leaped off my seat in fright, and I don’t remember sleeping soundly for a very long time afterwards...

But these days, I know better. The biggest clue that something was going to happen was the film hadn’t already ended, or that the credits hadn’t started to roll- because if the film keeps rolling, something’s yet to happen. I didn’t know that back then, at whatever age I was- I didn’t dissect films as I watched them. I never once thought “we’re seeing the gun / axe / car keys / bare feet because later it's sure to prove important".

So, there you go, I’ve changed my opinion. 

Don’t go and get me wrong, most modern horror is still crap (no plot, no character, no originality) but while you’re young you don’t really notice things like that (try watching Last House On The Left  again and defend the acting), and honestly, that’s not why you’re watching horror at that age, is it now? 

That’s not to say horror can’t be more than just jumps and cheap tricks, but let’s not pretend it was any different “back in our day”…

Friday, 21 June 2013

"THAT, MY FRIEND, WAS A DRAGON!"

Balin (The Hobbit, The Desolation of Smaug, 2013).

Big, but is it a dragon?

Late again, I know.

So, the new trailer for the Hobbit is causing a stir online, and we finally get a head-shot of the antagonistic dragon of the title.

Huh. So that's what Smaug looks like... 

How... Disappointing.

In the first Hobbit film I took issue with the amount of CGI that was used in place of physical effects. I found this the most jarring in 2 scenes: firstly, with the Goblins inside Moria (who had previously been so well portrayed by actors in makeup in LOTR), and with Smaug's attack on the Dwarfs during the Hobbit's opening. This later instance illustrated the single biggest flaw of CGI: heft. CGI creatures (as opposed to landscapes, which fair better) never have the 'weight' or 'presence' to completely convince, and Smaug's flight over the dwarf kingdom was both too fast and too 'light'; a beast that size would be moving slower and flapping it's wings with greater power. 


The Fell Beast, as seen in Return Of The King.

Oddly, the LOTR films handled this problem more smoothly- remember the Fell Beast? The winged bat-like creature that the Ringwraith rode into battle, attacking Gondor from the skies? It 'felt' more real. When it dived it was fast, but it didn't move like a jet! 


The Horntail, giving Harry a run for his money.

Still, the Fell Beast is a rare example of a perfectly believable CGI creature, so I thought "maybe I'm being overly picky to compare Smaug to the Fell Beast", and I put aside my concerns- still excited to see Smaug's grand reveal. I thought a decent design would atone for the lack or realism, so imagine my disappointment with the above film-still from the new Hobbit trailer. Not only is the design more like something from How To Train Your Dragon (some of them monsters looked pretty silly, didn't they*?), but the quality of the effects are terrible! It's like a straight-to-DVD dragon, from the type of films with titles like 'Shark Vs Ninja' and 'Stripper Zombies From Planet X', or 'I am Legendary'. Even the dragon in BBC's Merlin looks better!


A Dragon, according to the BBC... Looks a little like the Loch Ness monster.

Nevermind. Maybe it's just more of a let-down after the effects in LOTR? Actually, taking another glance at the first picture, that is pretty rubish, isn't it? It looks so obviously fake, let's hope the effects are still unfinished! Although, I doubt they'd include such a shot in the trailer if it was still being tweaked.


Rein Of Fire. I'll confess I've not seen this film all the way through, is it any good?

In my mind (at least) there is only one real movie dragon, and although others have come close (Harry Potter's Horntail and the creatures from Reighn Of Fire spring to mind), it still reins supreme. Dark, brooding, frighting; everything a real dragon should be...

Ladies and gents, I bring you 'Vermithrax Pejorative', from the (suprisingly dark) Disney film Dragonslayer. So-so film, unpronounceable name, and a very camp Peter MacNicol as the heroic lead, but one fucking awesome Dragon!


"Holy shit!" Dragon Slayer's formidable Vermithrax.


  ...Peter Jackson take note: that, my friend, is a real dragon.



*In defense of How To Train Your Dragon; some of those creatures were supposed to be daft and loveable, but the  King Dragon in the film's climax was terrifying...



Monday, 10 June 2013

"IF YOU THINK THIS HAS A HAPPY ENDING, YOU HAVEN'T BEEN PAYING ATTENTION..."

'The Boy' (Game Of Thrones, season 3)



"We're here for the party- let's get slaughtered."




So, the Red Wedding, huh? What did you make of that?

Rather than drum on about how miserable an experience Game Of Thrones is, I've decided to simply list the dead (from the TV show, not the books). I've divided these into two camps; dead sympathetic characters, dead villainous characters.

Obviously, SPOILERS.

The sympathetic;

  1. Robb Stark - great hope of the North and 'avenging son'.
  2. Talisa Stark - Robb's pregnant wife.
  3. Catelyn Stark - Stark matriarch, died thinking wrongly that all her children were dead.
  4. Eddard Stark - Stark patriarch, stripped of his honor and then beheaded.
  5. Ros - Small time hooker, tortured to death after being dragged into politics.
  6. Rodrick Cassel - Winterfell's master-of-arms, executed by Theron Greyjoy. 
  7. Yoren - Dies smuggling Aryn out of King's Landing. 
  8. Old Nan - Bran's nurse.
  9. Luwin - Wise man and advisory at Winterfell.
  10. Rakharo - Loyal brother-in-law of the Khaeesi, decapitated off-screen.
  11. Mordane - Sansa's tutor, killed on Eddard's arrest.
  12. Robert Baratheon - OK, so a bit dickish, but not evil. Poisoned by his wife.
  13. Renly Baratheon - Again, a prat but not evil.
  14. Drogo - Not technically good, but made more wholesome by his wife's influence.

The villainous;

  1. Vaserys Targaryen - Foppish and arrogant prick, killed after attacking his sister.
  2. Orell - small-time villain, a Wildling shaman who takes a dislike to Jon Stark.
  3. Craster - Sacrifices his newborn sons to the Walkers in return for survival. Nice.
  4. Pyat Pree - Nosferatu-looking sorcerer, set alight by dragons (what did he really expect?)
  5. Xaro - double crosser left to die in his own vault.


Notice the list is perhaps a little one sided? About 3:1.

Like I've said before, Game Of Thrones is a show about villains, not heroes.It's almost as if decent characters are only introduced to meet grisly endings to set up the stories bad-guys. RR Martin's reasoning is he likes to surprise his readers, but sadly this isn't shocking anymore- it's entirely predictable. This trick has been overused now. Yes, it's morbid and brutal, but hardly surprising:
The Starks are on the brink of winning the war against the Lannisters (only half way through the books, so that's obviously not happening), Robb's married and his wife's pregnant, and he's put his issues with his mum behind him. It's all a bit too happy and neat to last... So, what do they do? They attend a wedding hosted by the creepy, bitter and cowardly old guy who they recently screwed over. That's a brilliant idea Robb, good for you!


"Babe... Honey... Are you OK?"

Saturday, 8 June 2013

"NOS SALVUM FAC NOCTE..."


Night Breaker oath (We Make Safe The Night).




http://nos-salvum-fac-nocte.blogspot.co.uk/

So, I have another project in mind... Click the link to find out more.

Don't expect anything in the very immediate future, what with me having to finish my NVQ3 and my first novel, but this is deffinately something I'll come back to.

Any ideas or input, leave a comment.





Friday, 7 June 2013

THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE 2, FULL SEQUENCE; Carlisle's Final Word

" Stop crying. You're only making daddy's willy harder!"
Martin's father. 


Baby sitter for hire.
Script Logic; 0/2

Pace; 1/2

Acting; 1/2

Aesthetic; 1/2

Originality & Intention; 1/2

Final Score; 4/10






Final Word: I'd like to go on record now and say that I'm not quite sure why this film even exists. It's morally questionable, pointless and putrid. Actually I'm quite surprised it even got a score as high as 4, but my reviews are nothing if not fair...
The script falls to pieces very early on, and although it's painfully clear that none of this is really happening other than in the main characters fractured mind (and if that's a spoiler then I'm seriously worried about the humanity) that hardly excuses some of the more glaring issues, and while the pace is never lively it's not exactly dull either. Most of the performances showcased here wouldn't qualify for your local theater group, but Laurence Harvey, as the antagonist, is exceptional; in fact it's his performance alone that gives the film any sort of credibility- feeble but too skin-crawlingly deranged and sadistic to ever be sympathetic. In fact, I'd love to know how this film was pitched to him "hey, you're creepy, sweaty and fat, and you look like you'd fuck a helpless woman with barbed wire- you're perfect for this role!"
Interestingly (did I really just say that?), the film tells the story of a psychopath who tries to emulate (in his imagination at least) what he's seen in the previous Human Centipede film, so this is actually less a sequel and more of a meta-spin-off which breaks the 'fourth wall'*. Having said that, the film does little to explore that interesting set up and very quickly (possible from minute 5) devolves into a series of grotesque and sexually violent torture porn scenarios.
So, if any of this sounds like 'your bag', then go knock yourself out and find a copy. For anyone who attaches even the smallest amount of importance to things like plot and character, you'd best be looking elsewhere...



* 'Breaking the fourth wall';  Breaking the fourth wall is when a character (or in this instance, the film itself) acknowledges their fictionality, by either indirectly or directly addressing the audience. The term is derived from stage theater, where by the stage has a back wall, two side walls and the 'fourth wall', an invisible wall between the actors and the audience (or between fiction and reality).

Thursday, 6 June 2013

"NEVER ANYTHING ON, IS THERE?"

Liz (Sean Of The Dead).

"Should have said- bass"


A quick guide on how I qualify the final score for the 'Carlisle's Final Word' posts...



0/10:                       God I hope to never have to sit through a film that scores 0.

0 to 2 out of 10:      Crap. Utter crap.

3 to 4 out of 10:      Useless, don't even bother watching this.

5 out of 10:             Watchable, if there's nothing else around. Hire it, don't buy it.

6 to 7 out of 10 :     Good, solid effort and enjoyable.

8 to 9 out of 10:     Excellent, worth seeing at the cinema, and certainly worth buying.

10/10:                    Perfect. Rare as hen's teeth. Need I say more? I couldn't fault it.



Tuesday, 4 June 2013

"TOGETHER WE WILL PUNISH THESE CREATURES, THESE... TURTLES!"

Shredder (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, 1990).


Michael Bay, play close attention: STOP.



So, not content with fucking up one beloved children's cartoon, it would seem that Michael Bay is financing / producing the next celluloid balls-up: the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

Here are some of the on-scene photos.

The guys in center are the actors who will later be replaced by CGI characters. Not a good start to things, I personally have a soft spot for the old rubber suits and masks. CGI rarely ever convinces, even when it's done right- Gollum as an example: good but not really 'there'.

Who the fuck are the masked terrorist types? Please, God, don't tell me they're the Foot Clan...

Stand-ins for the CGI turtles in center.

Hey, here's Megan Fox, in the role of April O'Neil. Wrong, wrong, wrong... I know that sounds nerdy, but either treat the source material with a little reverence or just make a completely different story! Nobody ever does, it's much better to leech off of the already established success of a franchise than it is to make your own way.


Fail.

Finally, and I can't speak for authenticity, but this could be the new-look for the Turtle characters. I can believe that as these look too pro for fan art, but I could be mistaken. I'm not a big fan of the face, but it's odd seeing any Turtle without their trademark bandanna...

Interesting, but is this true?


My hopes aren't high...

Sunday, 2 June 2013

TAKE SHELTER; Carlisle's Final Word

"You think I'm crazy? Well, listen up, there's a storm coming like nothing you've ever seen, and not a one of you is prepared for it"
Curtis 

It's perfectly normal to blow the family budget on building a bunker.


Script Logic; 2/2

Pace; 1/2

Acting; 2/2

Aesthetic; 2/2

Originality & Intention; 2/2

Final Score; 9/10




Final Word: On reflection, 9/10 does feel like a really high mark for a film I didn't much enjoy. Still, it's a film I'd definitely recommend, but one which you'd probably only watch once. The story concerns Curtis, as played with seething intensity by quality actor Michael Shannon (soon to be seen in Man Of Steel), a family man plagued by portentous visions of an apocalypse. However, poor Curtis struggles to convince the people he loves that his visions are real, and not the result of hereditary mental illness- and this uncertainty creates the film's tension. Through the duration of the film we witness Curtis' life coming apart at the seams and his once stable relationships unraveling while he takes desperate measures to protect his family. Although it feels perhaps twenty minutes too long the story culminates in a memorable and haunting payoff- one which I won't spoil for you here, and I recommend you don't go looking for answers online or you'll spoil the entire film. A successful but uneasy mix of drama, psychological horror and almost unbearable unease.