Showing posts with label Alien. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alien. Show all posts

Thursday, 29 May 2014

"SOMETIMES PEOPLE ONLY SEE HORRIBLE, TERRIBLE THINGS IN MY PAINTINGS..."

H.R. Giger 

The man himself.

A sad farewell to H.R. Giger, the man who shaped so much of my life. Sorry this is so belated...

Beyond the influence of my parents, Giger* is likely the person who had the biggest impact on my life and the direction I have chosen for myself.

"When I was a young boy, I was obsessed with skulls and mummies and things like that."
H.R. Giger

I always enjoyed drawing, and from early childhood I had a natural flair for it- and this gave me an appreciation for other people's work. While I was in my early teens my mother showed me the film Aliens, knowing full well I was going to love it (out of sequence, I know, but it still holds up on its own). I remember being blown away by the creature design and immediately became interested in not only the 'creation' of movies, but who could have possibly imagined such a nightmare. That, as I'm sure it did for many others, led me to the works of H.R. Giger- who had earned an academy award for his work on the first Alien film**, designing the creature itself as well as the desolate landscape of the planet where the ill fated crew of the Nostromo first encounter it. That's when I started to take art seriously; not just as an interest but as a possible career. Aliens soon became one of my all-time favorite movies.
Giger is the reason I excelled in art at school, submitted the work that I did, and pursued the subject beyond mandatory education... I may no longer seek art as a profession (well, I still do a little freelance work here and there), but it's certainly shaped who I am today.

"You get talent when you discover the ground of your pain."
 H.R. Giger

His work on Alien earned him international attention, and rightly so.

Whatever your personal opinions on his work, whether they're a kind of morbid and immature kitsch*** or a deeply unsettling and surreal look into the physical and sociological environment surrounding us, there can be no denying the level of talent and imagination required for their creation; talent and imagination that H.R. Giger had in spades...


"Some people say my work is often depressing and pessimistic, with the emphasis on death, blood, overcrowding, strange beings and so on, but I don't really think it is."
H.R. Giger

Goodbye H.R. Giger, may you forever ride the ghost train home.
February  5, 1914 - May 12, 2014.



A typical Giger piece; a surreal and Freudian sado-masochistic exploration of feminine form and bio-mechanical organs.




*It's pronounced "Geager", like eager. not as in "Geiger counter".

 **James Cammeron infamously cut H.R. Giger out of production for his sequel to Alien, choosing to work on the creature designs himself. However, Giger was subsequently rehired by David Fincher for the 3rd installment-creating what many consider (myself included) the Alien's most awe-inspiring interpretation.


***I said to my tutor "you dismiss Giger because you call his work Kitsch, but you're hanging all this shit by Andy-fucking-Warhole around the room? You don't see any irony in that?" What a clueless dick.

Thursday, 4 October 2012

ALIEN; Carlisle's Final Word.

"I can't lie to you about your chances, but... you have my sympathies."
Ash.
 
 
Script Logic; 2/2
Pace; 1/2
Acting; 2/2
Aesthetic; 2/2
Originality & Intention; 2/2
Score; 9/10



Final Word; Ignore the fact that the look of the film is starting to show signs of dating, and consider the restrictions of the shoe-string budget and effects, and the film is nothing short of remarkable. Compare it to the cardboard scenery and rubber-masks of its peers (Star Trek, Doctor Who and Star Wars, A New Hope) and you have a truly believable world and an absolutely terrifying monster. Solid acting, and a sharp (if slow-burning) script that takes the standard ‘slasher’/ ‘3 Little Indians’ idea and transplants it into space. Genre defining and iconic.

Saturday, 22 September 2012

"THE TRICK, POTTER, IS NOT MINDING THAT IT HURTS..."

*Peter Weland, Prometheus (2012).


Oh Prometheus, you troublesome beast...





Well, maybe I should prefix this review with a little background information:

I, like many of you (I’m sure) sometimes struggle to make ends meet. My ‘better half’ is pregnant, and before the approaching due-date we decided to have one last night of freedom. We both agreed that “dinner and a movie” would be good, and I managed to convince her to see Prometheus. No mean feat, her not being big on science fiction.
Although I plan to write at length about this later, cinema costs are now close to extortion. Without the added costs of driving to-and-from, or paying for a car park, you’re looking at between £7 and £13 for a cinema ticket, depending on venue and 3D or 2D screenings. Let’s not forget snacks and a drink, that’s about another £5  to £10 a head. So for the two of us to just go see a movie we’re looking at paying around the £40 mark, travel not included. I remember when the cinema used to be a cheap night out…

I won’t beat around the bush, as you can tell by having a quick look at the scores avaliable in the 'Carlisle's Final Word' review, Prometheus failed to live up the level of hype and expectation that surrounded it. It is of course possible that the disappointment concerning my ‘last night of freedom’, as well as the expenses surrounding it, is partly to blame. The following is as even handed as I can be, and I’m nowhere near as cantankerous as I was on leaving the cinema. Counter arguments are always encouraged, but are still incorrect.



Here goes. The next section is spoiler free…

Prometheus, if nothing else, is certainly intriguing, whether you’re discussing the plot points or the circumstances around the projects traumatic birth.

As I’ve stated previously, this IS a film in the long-suffering Alien franchise, and it’s a confused entry at that. To be honest, although ‘They’ say the story started off as an Alien prequel and mutated into something different along the way, the film actually feels like a totally independent story with Alien-franchise references uncomfortably forced into it- and that may well be one of the film’s biggest problems. The content is almost entirely permissible at 12A, with some pointless low-end 15 certificate violence. For this a multitude of unnecessary and under-developed characters are introduced for the sole purpose of being killed-off in scenes that feel as if they are included only to liven the pace and reinforce the Alien content.

Perhaps the film would have kept more integrity if the Alien references were trimmed entirely, because they fail to serve the story in any way and feel laboured, as unnatural as a square peg in a round hole.

Instead of being intellectually gratifying (the aim) or torturously terrifying (as was Alien), the film is as thrilling as a carpet convention, as frightening as a leaky tap, non-cannon, and fails to deliver on its lofty (and cliché ridden) premise: seriously, directors shouldn’t indulge such overused material or theological ideas unless they have something unique, insightful or enlightening to bring to the table.


On the positive side, the film looks great and the sets are spookily atmospheric, and some of the acting is top-draw. Unfortunately, the good quality acting highlights those amongst the cast who aren’t quite up to task...



Well, that was my thoughts on the film itself. Now I’m going to address some big issues I have with the plot itself. Warning, spoilers ahead.

How can an expert geologist with mapping devices get lost coming out of a straight tunnel? Some expert.

Why would anyone approach a hostile alien-cobra, of which absolutely nothing is known, with all the fear and awe you'd associate with approaching a 3-legged puppy?
Why even consider setting fire to an ‘ill’ man when you have a perfectly functioning, state-of-the-art quarantine bay (used later)? Would seem a little excessive.

If you’re an android, programmed to protect your boss, a multiu-millionaire who is secretly in hiding onboard the ship, why run the risk of infecting one of the crew with alien slime? And why then introduce your boss to an alien creature that you know full-well has its mind set to destroying Earth? Stupid android.

Yes, the air is breathable, but why run the risk of removing your helmet? And again, why remove your helmet after you discover the Alien ship was actually a military installation working on biological weaponry?

The film Alien is set eighty years from these events. Aliens and Alien 3 fifty years after that. So why, one hundred and thirty years into the future, is there no technology to successfully remove an alien parasite without killing the host when that technology exists in Prometheus? 

If a giant ship is rolling after you (like a giant biscuit), why not run sideways? 

How did the Weyland business empire continue if Weyland himself and his only child are both killed in this film?

Note to the writers; if the shocking revelation of your story is that the ‘Engineers’ are actually human, then perhaps don’t reveal that in your opening scene? Sort of takes away from your climax.

The effect of the black jelly is too inconsistent. Don’t give me that “oh, it reacts to the mental state of the life form it comes in contact with” because it’s bollocks. I defy someone to explain that rationally.

Assuming the aliens stayed in contact with their own kind, why when their weapons base (the setting of the film) became poisoned did others not take up the task of ending life on earth 2000 years ago? The film points out that they have a home world, so they weren’t the last of their kind. Didn’t they have communications of some kind, I dun ‘no, like Facebook or something?

The music is (for the most part) too upbeat and majestic, more fitting for a cartoon adventure about lost kittens, or about a brave little toy who loses his owner.

How did the android learn the alien’s language? I mean, they do answer this; apparently by studying the similarities in ancient languages. Ahem, bullshit, ahem! And even so, understanding an alien’s language shouldn’t mean you can effortlessly activate their technology…

Nobody at any point stayed in contact with Earth. Seems a bit stupid.

Why did Weyland have to hide aboard the ship like a stowaway, it was his fucking ship! Surely if the man is paying the bills he pretty much gets to set the parameters? I mean, the scientists were hardly going to pass-up the expedition rather than take along some old codger, were they?

How could the Romans confuse the alien for Jesus? Assuming they did, which I believe is the crux of the film. The ‘Engineers’ stayed in contact with earth after creating humanity, visiting on occasion, till they eventually come visit us during the Roman Empire. This ends badly, they crucify the ‘Engineer’ and so his kin decide ‘fuck the humans’. They fly away and work on a biological weapon to destroy us / their creation.



My final thought... Jesus = average looking guy with a big beard, very mellow and peaceful, even in the face of adversity. Engineer = 8 foot tall unstoppable humanoid with no hair whatsoever and aggressive tendencies.

Friday, 25 May 2012

"I ADMIRE ITS PURITY"

Ash. Alien (1979)

Why am I not more excited by this film?

Growing up I was the biggest fan of the Alien films. Alien was atmospheric and creepy, Aliens was a white-knuckle action film. I'm one of the few people who actually enjoy Alien 3, an underrated thriller plagued by behind-the-scenes drama (so much so that it's miraculous they wrestled a film out of it at all). Less said about Alien Resurrection the better, and then the Aliens Vs Predator franchise killed the thing stone dead... Story over, or so I thought.

Then, out of nowhere, there's talk of starting over with a remake. Then talk of Ridley Scott and James Cameron working together for a sequel. I dismissed that as 'too good to be true', and indeed it was. But the rumors of Scott still being on for the project persisted. Then they were confirmed, for a prequel. I was interested. It was an obvious decision really; if you can't go forward, go backwards.

Then something strange happened. Suddenly it wasn't an Alien project at all, it was unrelated. Then it was. And then it wasn't again. Finally it 'was and it wasn't'. Glad they cleared that up.



So this is where we are now: it's set in the same world as Alien, before the first Alien film, but it won't feature the Alien. They (by this I mean the cast and Ridley Scott himself) still pretentiously proclaim that it's not a prequel. that's an argument for another day, and probably worth a post in its own right*.

From what I gather, an expedition is assembled to investigate the possibility that UFOs had come to our planet during the dawn of mankind- and are possibly responsible for our being here. They trace the UFO to a distant planet by deciphering the clues in caveman paintings and stumble across the crashed ship from the first Alien film. From that point in the proverbial 'shit hits the wall'.



Nice idea. It's had an intriguing viral marketing campaign, it's got a top-notch cast including Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender and Guy Pearce, a spooky trailer (no coincidence that it's very similar to the first Alien trailer, and I'm positive that's the same music), a director who (despite some absolute turkeys in his career) I still admire, and it's set in a world that i adore.

So, again I ask you, Why am I not more excited by this film?



Is it that I can't get my head around it being set in the same world as Alien, only without the titular monster? Is it that it just looks a bit self-important? Is it that I'm pretty sure I can already see where the film will draw it's conclusion (that like the Alien of the previous films, the human race are some form of biological weapon)? Is it that I've lost faith in Scott as a director after Kingdom Of Heaven and Robin Hood? Is it that I hear the studio is forcing them to cut it at a 12A to get a bigger audience?

What the hell is my problem? I should be eating this up.



Anyway, here's the three minute trailer. Hope you enjoy it more than I did.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIJeQNyZ6VE&feature=relmfu


* A note for Ridley Scott (I'm sure he'll read this at some point). If it's set in the same world, features some of the same characters, the same technology, and the same ship, then it's a prequel. End of argument really. That, and you've had to credit the original writers of the first Alien film, which also confirms that this is indeed a prequel... Enjoy your millions, don't mess this up!




And just what the hell is this???